close

指正哈蟆「拿戈翰瑪第经集第一卷首页“使徒保罗祷告词”」
(https://www.douban.com/group/topic/167880985/)

哈蟆说:「拿戈翰瑪第经集 (Nag Hammadi Scriptures)出土于1945年。经集包括了13部纸莎草纸经书。……」

这是什么东西呢?答案:新约次经伪经大集!
请看GOTQUESTION 网站解释

「Nag Hammadi is a town in northern Egypt where a collection of ancient writings was discovered in 1945. The collection of writings has since been titled the Nag Hammadi library, or the Nag Hammadi scrolls, or the Nag Hammadi codices. The vast majority of the scrolls in the Nag Hammadi library represent the writings of what was/is known as Christian Gnosticism.绝大多数卷轴都代表着被称为基督教诺斯底(Gnosticism,即追求神秘主义的早期基督教异端)教的作品。

The Nag Hammadi library is frequently pointed to as an example of "lost books of the Bible." 常被称为“失去的圣经”According to the conspiracy theory, the early Christians tried to destroy these Gnostic writings because they contained secret teachings about Jesus and Christianity. The Nag Hammadi library was supposedly the result of faithful efforts of Gnostic monks to save the truth about Jesus Christ from the persecution of non-Gnostic Christians. The Nag Hammadi scrolls include works known as the gospel of Truth, the gospel of Philip, the apocryphon of John, the apocalypse of Adam, and the acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles. 它包括被称为《真相福音》,《腓力福然》,《约翰(John)的启示》,《亚当(Adam)的启示》,以及《彼得和十二使徒的行径》的作品。The most famous Nag Hammadi scroll is the only known complete copy of the gospel of Thomas.最有姓名的是《多马福音》

So, what are we to make of the Nag Hammadi library? Should some or all of the scrolls be in the Bible? Absolutely not. 圣经中的某些或全部书卷应该存在吗? 绝对不。First, the Nag Hammadi scrolls are forgeries. 首先,Nag Hammadi卷轴是伪造的。 The Apostle Philip did not write the gospel of Philip. The Apostle Peter did not write the acts of Peter. The gospel of Thomas was not written by the Apostle Thomas. 使徒腓力没有写腓力的福音。 使徒彼得没有写彼得的行为。 多马福音不是由使徒多马写的。These scrolls were fraudulently written in their names in order to give them legitimacy in the early church. 这些卷轴以虚假的名称写成,目的是使它们在早期的教堂中具有合法性。Thankfully, the early church fathers were nearly unanimous in recognizing these Gnostic scrolls as fraudulent forgeries that espouse false doctrines about Jesus Christ, salvation, God, and every other crucial Christian truth. 值得庆幸的是,早期的教父几乎一致认为这些诺斯替教卷轴是欺诈性伪造,支持关于耶稣基督,救恩,上帝和其他所有关键基督教真理的错误教义。There are countless contradictions between the Nag Hammadi library and the Bible. 它和圣经之间有无数矛盾。

While the Nag Hammadi library was an exciting find, the only "value" in the Nag Hammadi library is that the scrolls give us insight into what early "heretics" taught and practiced. 卷轴让我们了解了早期的“异端”教义和实践。Recognizing the false doctrine that plagued the early church will help us better to understand it and refute it today. 认识到困扰早期教会的错误教义将有助于我们更好地理解它并在今天驳斥它。」(https://www.gotquestions.org/Nag-Hammadi.html)

==================================================

然后哈蟆翻译:《使徒保罗祷告词》

不知道他翻译得准确与否。但是,我们现在已经知道:

这些伪经,是假冒使徒姓义写的,所以,这《使徒保罗祷告词》应该不是使徒保罗写的!

这句:「…… 求你愈我顽疾……」

已经显出是假的,因为保罗从未求过疾病,反之他求神叫疾病离开他。他说:

林后 12:7又 恐 怕 我 因 所 得 的 启 示 甚 大 , 就 过 于 自 高 , 所 以 有 一 根 刺 加 在 我 肉 体 上 , 就 是 撒 但 的 差 役 , 要 攻 击 我 , 免 得 我 过 于 自 高 。

林后 12:8为 这 事 , 我 三 次 求 过 主 , 叫 这 刺 离 开 我 。

从这句:「赐我得见天使之所未见 赐我得闻帝王之所未闻 赐我得着他人之所未得,那开天辟地之初所生的,天使般的,仿神之身影。」

显示他祈求一些超越的知识,是其他人所没有的。这正是诺斯底异端!!!

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    回答无神反基人士 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()